Virtual ​Library
  • Library
    • About the library >
      • Teacher Librarians
      • Book Week Celebrations
      • Blind Date with a Book
    • Book Week 2023 Events
    • Oliver Library
    • Book Trailers
    • Premier's Reading Challenge
    • Join NSW State Library >
      • Online Membership Application - State Library
      • NSW State Library E-resources
  • Information Fluency
    • Infowhelm
    • Digital Citizenship >
      • Introduction - Our Digital Life
      • Cybersafety
      • Cyberbullying
      • Copyright and Fair Dealing
      • Digital Footprint
    • Critical Thinking
    • Research Process >
      • Initiate >
        • Deciding on a Research Topic
      • Locate >
        • Online Search Techniques
      • Select >
        • Evaluating Sources
        • Primary vs Secondary Sources
      • Organise
      • Present
      • Assess
    • Self-reflection for metacognition
    • Note Taking & Summarising
    • Plagiarism
    • Referencing
    • Paraphrasing
    • Annotated Bibliography
    • Mind Maps for note taking and brainstorming
  • Curriculum
    • ATSI Education >
      • The Aboriginal 8 Ways of Learning Pedagogy
    • Prelim & HSC >
      • SMH 2019 HSC Study Guide
      • English Prelim & HSC >
        • HSC Common Module - Texts and Human Experiences
        • English Standard Module A - Language, Identity and Culture
        • Standard Module B: Close Study of Literature
        • English Advanced Module A: Textual Conversations
        • Advanced Module B: Critical Study of Literature
        • Advanced Module C: The Craft of Writing
        • Post Colonial Literature
      • Maths Prelim & HSC
      • Science Prelim & HSC >
        • Biology
        • Chemistry
        • Earth and Environmental Science
        • Physics
      • HSIE Prelim & HSC >
        • Aboriginal Studies
        • Ancient History
        • Business Studies
        • Economics
        • Geography Prelim & HSC
        • Legal Studies
        • Modern History
        • Society and Culture
      • CAPA Prelim & HSC >
        • Dance
        • Drama
        • Music
        • Visual Arts
      • PDHPE - Prelim & HSC
      • TAS Prelim & HSC >
        • CAFS Community and Family Studies
        • Food Technology
    • 7 - 10 Subject Areas >
      • English 7-10
      • Maths 7-10
      • Science 7-10
      • HSIE 7-10
      • CAPA 7-10
      • PDHPE 7-10
      • TAS 7-10
    • Trove
  • Learning Tools
    • PEEL Paragraph Writing
    • Academic writing
    • A.L.A.R.M.
    • A Glossary of NESA Key Words
    • SQ3R Reading 4 Understanding
    • Bloom's Taxonomy
    • How to study effectively
    • Learning, your brain and Neuroscience
    • Memorising and Mnemonics
    • Mind Maps for note taking and brainstorming
    • PMI Plus, Minus, Interesting Strategy
    • What is your learning preference?
  • Inspiration

Evaluating Sources

Share on Facebook and Twitter
Picture
It is important to understand that not all information is equal.
​We need to be selective and use critical thinking when it comes to the information sources we use. Just because you find it in print or online, do not assume that it is accurate or reliable. It is shown that students have difficulty determining fact from opinion and need help sharpening their critical thinking skills when using and evaluating information sources (Hough 2011; OECD 2011).

Likewise, more than 80 percent of students can't tell the difference between an advertisement and a news story. Students will often simply click on the first result, which is often an ad.
Users often don't realise that commercial websites pay handsomely to have their webpages appear at the top of a web search results list.
​
In addition, studies show that the first search result is clicked on twice as much as the second, and the second twice as much as the third. It pays to be savvy and use critical thinking to evaluate information sources.

​See 
Primary Verses Secondary Sources

See also Critical Thinking Skills Cheat sheet
CRAAP Criteria for Evaluating Information Sources
Currency, Relevance, Accuracy, Authorship & Purpose (CRAAP)
Picture
The CRAAP anagram is an effective way to help students remember source evaluation criteria.
​It is important to point out, however, that the anagram does not list the criteria in order of importance. Relevance and Accuracy, for example, are undoubtedly more important criterion than Currency.
The Criteria
- What is the PURPOSE of the source?
Is it to inform, to present opinions, to report research, entertain or to sell a product? For what audience is it intended - general public? children? scholars? 

- Is it RELEVANT or suitable for my purpose?
Is the information relevant to the question at hand? Is the information suitable to my age and academic level? Is the depth of coverage adequate?

- Who is the AUTHOR?
Are the author's qualifications or experience given? Are they an expert in their field? What credentials or special knowledge does he/she have? Does the author reference their information sources? Does the author have a certain bias?
[Bias means being favourable to something because you have a special interest in it. For example, if someone asks you where is the best place to get a hamburger, you might recommend 'Burger Joint' because you work there. So because you work there you have bias. Or you may tell them to go somewhere else, because you really don't like working at 'Burger Joint'. Bias can work either way and means you cannot provide a fair and impartial opinion or point of view.]


- Who is the publisher?
Is it published by an academic institution such as: a university? Is the information published by a government agency? By a large commercial publisher? By a non-profit organisation or a business? The publisher may give clues as to the reliability and/or bias of the information presented. What does the URL tell you? See table below.

- How CURRENT or up to date is this information?
Are the statistics and facts cited in the source up to date? Is it current? Is there a "last updated" date shown on the web page?

- Is the information ACCURATE?  Should I believe this information? What authority does it have?
Does it contain documented facts or personal opinion? Is bias evident? Are there any footnotes, bibliographies, or lists of references that let you check the accuracy of statistics or factual information? Is the documentation from published sources or personal webpages?

Slideshow - Evaluating Sources (AKA the 'CRAAP Test')
Picture
Click the image to view the slideshow
How to Spot fake news online (ABC News 2018) 
Picture
(Andersdotter 2017)
Watch the Video
Picture
Picture
What can I tell from an Internet address?
An Internet address is also called a URL (Uniform Resource Locator).
Looking at the top-level domain (end of the URL) will often tell you something about what kind of website you're visiting (Eg. .com  .edu  .org  .gov  .net  etc.).   This may provide a clue about how trustworthy or objective the information might be.
See table below.


Examples of sources that are often the most credible: 
  • Official government websites
  • Institutional sites that represent universities, regulatory agencies, governing bodies, and respected organisations with specific expertise
  • Peer-reviewed journals
  • Reputable news sources

Examples of sources that are often considered less credible: 
  • Blogs
  • Web forums
  • Individual or business websites
  • Materials published by an entity that may have an ulterior motive

What about Wikipedia?
Wikipedia is not considered a credible source for academic purposes. This is mostly because anyone can edit the information at any time and post incorrect information. Also Wikipedia editors do not always correctly cite the source of the information posted.

Yes, Wikipedia is a fair starting point to give you an overview of a topic but it is by no means an end point. You also need to research and reference credible and reliable sources that carefully cite their sources.


​Top 10 Reasons not to rely on Wikipedia

For more information see 
How to Evaluate Web Resources

Picture
Picture
Developing Critical Thinking Skills (NSW DoE 2019)
Website Evaluation Scaffold
Your browser does not support viewing this document. Click here to download the document.
Download the scaffold
evaluating_electronic_sources.docx
File Size: 16 kb
File Type: docx
Download File

Share to Facebook and Twitter

Take the online quiz

References and further reading

Andersdotter, K. (2017). Alternative Facts and Fake News – Verifiability in the Information Society. IFLA International Federation of Library Associations. Retrieved from https://blogs.ifla.org/lpa/2017/01/27/alternative-facts-and-fake-news-verifiability-in-the-information-society/

Gettysburg College. (2014) How to Evaluate Resources. Retrieved from
http://www.gettysburg.edu/library/research/tips/webeval/index.dot

Hough, M. (2011). Libraries as iCentres: Helping Schools. ACCESS, 25(1) 5-9.

Jazynka, K. (2017). Colleges turn ‘fake news’ epidemic into a teachable moment. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/magazine/colleges-turn-fake-news-epidemic-into-a-teachable-moment/2017/04/04/04114436-fd30-11e6-99b4-9e613afeb09f_story.html?utm_term=.cbfa2f1dc8f9

Knutson, J. (2017). Help Students Fact-Check the Web Like the Pros. Common Sense Education. Retrieved from https://www.commonsense.org/education/blog/help-students-fact-check-the-web-like-the-pros


Kiely, E., & Robertson, L. (2016). How to Spot Fake News. FactCheck.org. Retrieved from http://www.factcheck.org/2016/11/how-to-spot-fake-news/

Meriam Library. (2010). Evaluating Information: Applying the CRAAP Test. California State University, Chico. Retrieved from http://www.csuchico.edu/lins/handouts/eval_websites.pdf

Milgram, J. (2018). 6 Signs of Credible Sources: Do Unreliable Websites Sabotage Your Research?. Custom-writing.org. Retrieved from https://custom-writing.org/blog/time-out-for-your-brain/31220.html

OECD. (2011). Pisa 2009 Results: Students online: Digital Technologies and Performance, (Volume VI). Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Retrieved from
http://archivos.agenciaeducacion.cl/Volumen_VI_Informe_Internacional_version_ingles.pdf

OECD (2015), Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection, OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved from
http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/PISA-2012-students-computers-australia.pdf

Teacher Tap. (2013) Evaluating Internet Sources. Retrieved from
http://eduscapes.com/tap/topic32.htm


 Vincent, J. (2015). Teens can't tell the difference between Google ads and search results. The Verge. Retrieved from http://www.theverge.com/2015/11/20/9768350/google-ads-search-results-ofcom

Virginia Tech. (2016). Information Skills Modules. Retrieved from

http://www.info-skills.lib.vt.edu/index.html

Wesson, S. (2011). What Makes a Primary Source a Primary Source?. Library of Congress. Retrieved from 
https://blogs.loc.gov/teachers/2011/10/what-makes-a-primary-source-a-primary-source/.

Video

Gulf Coast State College Library. (2013)  Evaluating Websites. Retrieved from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aem3JahbXfk


Creative Commons License
Our Virtual Library by Cathy Costello is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Cathy Costello teacher librarian virtual library Cathy Costello teacher librarian virtual library Cathy Costello teacher librarian virtual library Cathy Costello library Cathy Costello virtual library Cathy Costello librarian
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.